188宝金博页面版

  • 图案背景
  • 纯色背景
视图
标记
批注
批注本地保存成功,开通会员云端永久保存 去开通
GOOGOLPLEX

上传于:2025-08-29

粉丝量:200

资料来自于互联网,版权归相关出版社或者原作者所有,仅限于学习使用,不得从事商业活动,如有侵权,及时告知删除处理或向188宝金博页面版申请删除处理。如需咨询其他文献资料等请站内信联系


  • 相关
  • 目录
  • 笔记
  • 书签

暂无目录

点击鼠标右键菜单,创建目录

暂无笔记

选择文本,点击鼠标右键菜单,添加笔记

暂无书签

在左侧文档中,点击鼠标右键,添加书签

188宝金博页面版: The UPC Judge as EU Judge

下载积分: 10000

内容提示: Gerben HartmanForeword by Allan RosasThe UPC Judge as EU JudgeCooperation Between the Unified Patent Courtand the Court of Justice of the European UnionGerben HartmanThe UPC Judge as EU JudgeThe UPC Judge as EU JudgeCooperation Between the Unified Patent Court and the Court of Justice of the European UnionGerben HartmanAfter a decade of legal challenges, setbacks and delays, the Unified Patent Court (UPC) came into existence on 1 June 2023 as a court common to – at present – eighteen participating EU Mem...

文档格式:PDF | 页数:286 | 浏览次数:12 | 上传日期:2025-08-29 21:23:06 | 文档星级:
Gerben HartmanForeword by Allan RosasThe UPC Judge as EU JudgeCooperation Between the Unified Patent Courtand the Court of Justice of the European UnionGerben HartmanThe UPC Judge as EU JudgeThe UPC Judge as EU JudgeCooperation Between the Unified Patent Court and the Court of Justice of the European UnionGerben HartmanAfter a decade of legal challenges, setbacks and delays, the Unified Patent Court (UPC) came into existence on 1 June 2023 as a court common to – at present – eighteen participating EU Member States. The UPC is uniquely responsible for its decisions on the application and interpretation of EU law in actions relating to patents and supplementary protection certificates within its exclusive competence, in particular with respect to European patents with unitary effect. The question pursued in this book is how the UPC may cooperate, ‘as any national court’, with the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in accordance with the EU constitutional framework.In response to this complex question, the author provides in-depth analyses of the following issues:• what role the UPC, like any national court of a Member State, plays in the EU legal order and its judicial system;• whether the UPC may overcome the constitutional issues identified in Opinion 1/09 on an international patent court;• how the need to accord with the EU constitutional framework limits an international court established by an international agreement with non-EU States;• under which conditions the UPC has the power or obligation to refer questions to the CJEU, in accordance with Article 267 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) in particular; and• whether effective remedies are available under EU law if a decision of the UPC infringes EU law.Each of these issues is substantiated and clarified through detailed case studies and empirical research on the parties’ written submissions, hearing reports, opinions, decisions and related writings of judges, lawyers, and scholars.This book fills the need for a forward-looking, comprehensive study of the basic conditions for cooperation between the UPC and the CJEU, as well as of the mechanisms for ensuring compliance with those conditions and remedying infringement thereof. It seeks to help foster sincere cooperation in order to ensure effective legal protection of individuals’ rights conferred by EU law in the patent field. Judges, legal representatives, and parties in patent-related proceedings will find its contents particularly useful. In addition, as a study of the EU judicial cooperation system in the framework of EU, international and national law, its relevance beyond the UPC context will appeal to a broader audience of international law and EU law practitioners or scholars.

188宝金博页面版:关注我们

  • 新浪微博

关注188宝金博页面版公众号

188宝金博页面版
阅读
APP
阅读
返回
顶部
188宝金博页面版官网登录在线平台入口(2026已更新)—江苏协昌电子科技股份有限公司